If you’re a reader of this blog, then you know you’re on the best website on the Internet with alpha male content, definition and scenarios. Last weekend, I sat with a friend of mine, another alpha male, discussing the new concept of “sigma males.”
Is there such thing as a sigma male ? WTF is a sigma male ?
Sigma males are supposed to be these introverted types who “refuse to fit into any hierarchical categorization.”
Non-sense.
Hierarchy is not something you determine, or chose to be included or excluded from. So this “sigma” males are “lone wolves”. That’s just being an introvert, thank you. What they’re trying to say -I hope I got this right- is that sigmas don’t have followers, as opposed to alphas who have a lot of followers and lead them. It is assumed, by default, alpha males lead a lot of people…but that requires charisma and mass influence, doesn’t it ? Some people have it, some people don’t. Picking up a sub-category of alphas-those without followers- and naming it “sigmas” is disingenuous.
An alpha male is just that -whether he is leading anyone or not. Are you lacking followers, aren’t recognized by society or your community, and want to call yourself “sigma” ?
You’re either an alpha(2% or less of males) or a beta (98%). This whole thing “sigma” males is ridiculous. Why do you care about recognition, anyways ? Why do you need an audience to your greatness ? Whether a man has witnesses to his being is immaterial. When you are competing with another males – and we all compete one way or another- and you get noticed or not makes no difference.
Sigmas are the introverts who have no standing or human assets to show off, but still wanna be called “alphas”.
Until next time,
Max Cantor